1015SCG
Lecture 8
|
Enrico Fermi (1901-1954) was an Italian physicist known for his major contributions to nuclear physics, quantum theory, and statistical mechanics.
|
|
|
The Fermi Paradox asks why, given the vast size of the universe and the likelihood of extraterrestrial life, we have not yet observed any clear evidence of it.
|
|
We know that we live in a big old galaxy, in a big old universe
Consider for a moment the Milky Way Galaxy
- The Milky Way Galaxy has about 400 billion suns π
- Most of those suns have planetary systems around them.
So, there are trillions of planets.
The galaxy it's been around for about 10 billions years.
Even though there have been billions of years on billions of worlds
for civilizations to arise,
we see no evidence of any them in the galaxy at all. π¬
Where is everybody?
Source: Hubble Space Telescope - Ultra-Deep Field galaxies to Legacy field zoom out (May 2, 2019) Wikipedia
Fermi problems are estimation questions that use rough assumptions and simple calculations to obtain approximate answers.
An example is Enrico Fermi's estimate of the strength of the atomic bomb that detonated at the Trinity test, based on the distance traveled by pieces of paper he dropped from his hand during the blast. Fermi's estimate of 10 kilotons of TNT was well within an order of magnitude of the now-accepted value of 21 kilotons.
$AM = \bar{x} =\dfrac{1}{n}\ds \sum_{i=1}^{n}x_i$
Average of $n$ numbers $x_i$
|
$\bar{x} =\dfrac{0.81+0.9+0.94+0.85+0.88}{5}$ $\quad =0.876 \text{ m}$ |
|
$GM = \ds \left(\prod_{i=1}^{n} x_i\right)^{1/n}$
Multiplicative average of $n$ positive numbers $x_i$
|
$GM = \left(0.81 \times 0.9 \times 0.94 \times 0.85 \times 0.88\right)^{1/5}$ $\;\;\;\quad \approx 0.875 \text{ m}$ |
|
How to estimate unknown values?
What is the volume of a toilet cistern (the tank where water is stored)?
Underestimate: 1L
Underestimate: 50L
$GM = \sqrt{1\text{ L} \times 50 \text{ L}}$ $\approx 7 \text{ L}$
Underestimate: 25L
$GM = \sqrt{1\text{ L} \times 25 \text{ L}}$ $\approx 5 \text{ L}$
How many people in the world are sleeping at the moment?
Assume people sleep for 6hrs a day.
Fraction of the time sleeping: \(\dfrac{6\text{ h}}{24\text{ h}}\) \(=\dfrac{1}{4}\)
Amount sleeping = Number of people $\times$ fraction sleeping $\qquad$
$\qquad\qquad$\(\approx\) 8 billion people $\times \dfrac{1}{4} $ \(\approx\) 2 billion people
A number is in normalized scientific notation if it is in the form \[ \large \pm r \times 10^n \]
It is easy to compare numbers! π
Example:
How many orders of magnitude there is between 2 mL and 80 L?
\(\dfrac{80 \text{ L}}{2 \text{ mL}}\) \(=\dfrac{80 \text{ L}}{2 \text{ mL}} \times \dfrac{1000 \text{ mL}}{1 \text{ L}}\) \(=\dfrac{80\,000 }{2 }\) \(=40\, 000\) \(=4\times 10^4\)
There are about 4 orders of magnitude between 2 mL and 80 L
It is easy to find the geometric mean
\(\sqrt{10^a \times 10^b}\) \(=\sqrt{10^{a+b}}\) \(=10^{\frac{a+b}{2}}\)
Example:
Find the geometric mean of $40000$ and $0.00006$.
\(\sqrt{4\times 10^4 \times 6\times 10^{-5}}\) \(=\sqrt{24\times 10^{-1}}\) \(=\sqrt{2.4}\) \(\approx 1.5\)
Find the geometric mean of $10,000,000$ and $0.004$.
\(\sqrt{10^7\times 4\times ^{-3}}\) \(=\sqrt{4\times 10^4 }\) \(=\sqrt{4}\sqrt{ 10^{4}}\) \(=2\times 10^{4/2}\) \(=2\times 10^2\) \(=200\)
How much toilet paper do we use in Australia each year?
We are looking for $\dfrac{\text{rolls}}{\text{year}}$
How many times a person visits the toilet?
Underestimate: $\;1 \dfrac{\text{visit}}{\text{day}}$
Overestimate: $\;25 \dfrac{\text{visit}}{\text{day}}$
$N_t = \sqrt{25}$ $=5$
How much toilet paper do we use in Australia each year?
We are looking for $\dfrac{\text{rolls}}{\text{year}}$
What is the amount used each visit?
Underestimate: $\;1 \dfrac{\text{sheet}}{\text{visit}}$
Overestimate: $\;20 \dfrac{\text{sheet}}{\text{visit}}$
$N_p = \sqrt{20}$ $\approx 4.47$ $\approx 4$
How much toilet paper do we use in Australia each year?
Thus we have $\;N_t =5 \dfrac{\text{visit}}{\text{day}}\;$ and $\;N_p = 4 \dfrac{\text{sheet}}{\text{visit}}$
How many sheets of toilet paper does a person use in a year?
$N_t \times N_p \times \dfrac{365.25\text{ days}}{\text{year}}$
$5 \dfrac{\text{visit}}{\text{day}} \times 4 \dfrac{\text{sheet}}{\text{visit}} \times \dfrac{365.25\text{ days}}{\text{year}}$ $=7305\dfrac{\text{sheets}}{\text{year}}$
How much toilet paper do we use in Australia each year?
$5 \dfrac{\text{visit}}{\text{day}} \times 4 \dfrac{\text{sheet}}{\text{visit}} \times \dfrac{365.25\text{ days}}{\text{year}}$ $=7305\dfrac{\text{sheets}}{\text{year}}$
π§» Assume: $\;200 \dfrac{\text{sheets}}{\text{roll}}$
Then we have $\;\dfrac{7305\dfrac{\text{sheets}}{\text{year}}}{200 \dfrac{\text{sheets}}{\text{roll}}}$ $\approx 37 \dfrac{\text{rolls}}{\text{year}}$ per person
Population of Australia $\approx 28$ million $=2.8\times 10^7$
How much toilet paper do we use in Australia each year?
Population of Australia $\approx 28$ million $=2.8\times 10^7$
π$\;\; 37 \dfrac{\text{rolls}}{\text{year}}$ per person
Therefore $\;37 \dfrac{\text{rolls}}{\text{year}}\times 2.8\times 10^7 $ $\approx 10^9 \dfrac{\text{rolls}}{\text{year}}$
How much air would you breathe in a year?
Try it yourself! π π
See: THE SAND-RECKONER |
In The Sand Reckoner, Archimedes asked: βHow many grains of sand would be needed to fill the universe?β
|
|
Archimedes' strategy closely mirrors modern Fermi reasoning:
The goal was not precision β but order of magnitude. |
See: THE SAND-RECKONER |
Archimedes concluded that the universe could be filled with fewer than
\(10^{63}\) grains of sand.
To express such numbers, he developed a system extending beyond the Greek βmyriadβ (10,000).
Like modern Fermi problems, this was an exercise in structured estimation, scaling, and mathematical imagination.
Even though $10^{63}$ is unimaginably large, it is still 17 orders of magnitude smaller than the number of atoms in the observable universe, estimated at roughly $10^{80}$.
|
Archimedes was already thinking on a cosmic scale β 2200 years before modern astronomy. |
|
Any function $f(x)$ can be rewritten as an infinite sum \[f(x)= a_0 + a_1 x + a_2x^2 + a_3x^3+\cdots a_nx^n + \cdots\]
Example:
\(e^x \) \(= 1 +x + \dfrac{x^2}{2!}+ \dfrac{x^3}{3!} + \cdots + \dfrac{x^n}{n!}+ \cdots\)
where $n! = 1 \times 2 \times 3 \times \cdots \times (n-1) \times n.$
Truncating the Taylor series at second order gives useful approximations:
| Function | 2nd-order Taylor approx. |
| $e^x$ | $1 + x + \dfrac{x^2}{2}$ |
| $(1+x)^n$ | $1 + nx + \dfrac{n(n-1)}{2}x^2$ |
| $\ln(1+x)$ | $x - \dfrac{x^2}{2}$ |
| $\sin x$ | $x$ |
| $\cos x$ | $1 - \dfrac{x^2}{2}$ |
| $\tan x$ | $x$ |
These approximations are valid when $|x| \ll 1$.
Change the function in the input box. Drag slider to increase the number of terms in the Taylor series.
Using Taylor approximations:
\( \ds e^x = 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^3}{3!} + \cdots \)
| Approximation order | Expression | Estimate for $x=0.05$ |
| First order | $1 + x$ | $1 + 0.05$$\,=1.05$ |
| Second order | $1 + x + \dfrac{x^2}{2}$ | $1 + 0.05 + \dfrac{(0.05)^2}{2}$$\,=1.05125$ |
| Third order | $1 + x + \dfrac{x^2}{2} + \dfrac{x^3}{6}$ | $1.05125 + \dfrac{(0.05)^3}{6} \approx 1.05127$ |
| Calculator | $e^{0.05}$ | $\approx 1.051271096376024\ldots$ |
Higher-order approximations give better accuracy for small $x$.
\( \ds \cos x = \; \large ??? \)
| Approximation order | Expression | Estimate for $x=0.1$ |
| First order | ||
| Second order | ||
| Third order | ||
| Calculator |
Odd-power terms vanish for $\cos x$, so first- and third-order approximations coincide.
\( \ds \cos x = 1 - \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^4}{4!} - \cdots \)
| Approximation order | Expression | Estimate for $x=0.1$ |
| First order | $1$ | $1$ |
| Second order | $1 - \dfrac{x^2}{2}$ | $1 - \dfrac{(0.1)^2}{2} = 0.995$ |
| Third order | $1 - \dfrac{x^2}{2}$ | $0.995$ |
| Calculator | Exact value | $\cos(0.1) \approx 0.995004165\ldots$ |
Odd-power terms vanish for $\cos x$, so first- and third-order approximations coincide.
The population of the bacteria in the sample is given by \[ \large P(t) = 500 e^{0.001t} \] where $t$ is given in weeks.
Consider a second order approximation of $e^t$.
Using a second-order Taylor approximation for \( e^t\): \( \ds \;e^x \approx 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2}. \)
We approximate the exponential function using a second-order Taylor expansion around 0:
$$e^x \approx 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2}$$
For our population model: $\,P(t) = 500 e^{0.001t}\,$ we use $$e^{0.001t} \approx 1 + 0.001t + \frac{(0.001t)^2}{2}$$
Using the approximation:
$P(2) \approx 500 \cdot \left(1 + 0.001 \cdot 2 + \dfrac{(0.001 \cdot 2)^2}{2}\right)$
Step-by-step calculation:
$0.001 \cdot 2 = 0.002$
$\dfrac{(0.002)^2}{2} = 0.000002$
$1 + 0.002 + 0.000002 = 1.002002$
$P(2) \approx 500 \cdot 1.002002 \approx 501.001$
Solve $P(t) \approx 505$ using the second-order approximation:
$500 \cdot \left(1 + 0.001t + \dfrac{(0.001t)^2}{2}\right) = 505$
Divide both sides by 500:
$1 + 0.001t + \dfrac{(0.001t)^2}{2} \approx 1.01$
Let $x = 0.001t,$ then solve:
$\ds 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2} = 1.01 $ $\Ra \ds \frac{x^2}{2} + x - 0.01 = 0$
Solve quadratic: $x \approx 0.00995 \rightarrow t \approx 9.95$ weeks
Comparing the second-order Taylor approximation with exact values:
The approximation gives results virtually identical to the exact model for such small exponents.
That's all for today!See you in Week 9!
|
|